<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &lt;=&gt;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?feed=rss2&#038;p=135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=135</link>
	<description>for Epigram</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  6 Nov 2011 09:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=135&#038;cpage=1#comment-8039</link>
		<dc:creator>sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=135#comment-8039</guid>
		<description>When I recently tried to find out how I happened to write the same ap of the double negation Idiom twice by tracing identities with reflexity, I wondered how OTT&#039;s λ⁼ constructor might get along with implicit argument abstraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I recently tried to find out how I happened to write the same ap of the double negation Idiom twice by tracing identities with reflexity, I wondered how OTT&#8217;s λ⁼ constructor might get along with implicit argument abstraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
