http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=214 for Epigram Sun, 6 Nov 2011 09:25:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=214&cpage=1#comment-70786 Conor Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:22:39 +0000 http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=214#comment-70786 It's been observed that spotting the main actor in {teq '('} pExp :+: {teq '+'} pExp {teq ')'} is a mite tricky. It's perhaps injudicious to mix too much noise with infix ops. In this case, (:+:) {teq '('} pExp {teq '+'} pExp {teq ')'} might be a little clearer. It’s been observed that spotting the main actor in {teq ‘(’} pExp :+: {teq ‘+’} pExp {teq ‘)’} is a mite tricky. It’s perhaps injudicious to mix too much noise with infix ops. In this case, (:+:) {teq ‘(’} pExp {teq ‘+’} pExp {teq ‘)’} might be a little clearer.

]]>