<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Representing Concrete Syntax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?feed=rss2&#038;p=48" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=48</link>
	<description>for Epigram</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  6 Nov 2011 09:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conor</title>
		<link>http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=48#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Further to this...maybe I&#039;ll make a new entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to this&#8230;maybe I&#8217;ll make a new entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor</title>
		<link>http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 07:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=48#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Working on it at the moment, so hopefully soon. But if you&#039;re looking for a specific date, I just don&#039;t know. There are several other things I&#039;m also supposed to be working on right now. Hopefully we&#039;ll have the Node type nailed down some more today. It&#039;s mostly a question of coding up the grammar, with a couple of slightly sticky points&#8212;I&#039;m demanding that the elaborator retains complete ignorance of what identifiers are used to name variables, so scope must be resolved by a parsing phase. The elaborator will be prepared to divulge which &lt;em&gt;variables&lt;/em&gt; are in scope at any shed, but it won&#039;t help with their names, because it won&#039;t know them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working on it at the moment, so hopefully soon. But if you&#8217;re looking for a specific date, I just don&#8217;t know. There are several other things I&#8217;m also supposed to be working on right now. Hopefully we&#8217;ll have the Node type nailed down some more today. It&#8217;s mostly a question of coding up the grammar, with a couple of slightly sticky points&mdash;I&#8217;m demanding that the elaborator retains complete ignorance of what identifiers are used to name variables, so scope must be resolved by a parsing phase. The elaborator will be prepared to divulge which <em>variables</em> are in scope at any shed, but it won&#8217;t help with their names, because it won&#8217;t know them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyril Konopko</title>
		<link>http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyril Konopko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=48#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Can you tell me, please, when that protocol will be created and published, so I can use it to develop my editor further?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you tell me, please, when that protocol will be created and published, so I can use it to develop my editor further?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
