<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crude but Effective Stratification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?feed=rss2&#038;p=857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=857</link>
	<description>for Epigram</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  6 Nov 2011 09:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conor</title>
		<link>http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=857&#038;cpage=1#comment-79220</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=857#comment-79220</guid>
		<description>No, but it has occurred to me that it might be interesting to think in that direction, not least because it would be an excellent excuse to visit my old teacher, Tom Forster. There&#039;s nothing about these rules which suggests that there has to be a bottom universe. Things might shift downwards as easily as they shift up.

That said, the usual inductive-recursive method for making models of predicative type theories might struggle without an inductive characterization of the hierarchy. I wonder what we&#039;d do instead...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, but it has occurred to me that it might be interesting to think in that direction, not least because it would be an excellent excuse to visit my old teacher, Tom Forster. There&#8217;s nothing about these rules which suggests that there has to be a bottom universe. Things might shift downwards as easily as they shift up.</p>
<p>That said, the usual inductive-recursive method for making models of predicative type theories might struggle without an inductive characterization of the hierarchy. I wonder what we&#8217;d do instead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathnerd314</title>
		<link>http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=857&#038;cpage=1#comment-79121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathnerd314</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-pig.org/epilogue/?p=857#comment-79121</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at implementing &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Foundations&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NFU&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at implementing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Foundations" rel="nofollow">NFU</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
